ReelTalk Movie Reviews  


New Reviews
Beauty
Elvis
Lightyear
Spiderhead
Jurassic World Domini...
Interceptor
Jazz Fest: A New Orle...
Chip 'n Dale: Rescue ...
more movies...
New Features
Poet Laureate of the Movies
Happy Birthday, Mel Brooks
Score Season #71
more features...
Navigation
ReelTalk Home Page
Movies
Features
Forum
Search
Contests
Customize
Contact Us
Affiliates
Advertise on ReelTalk

Listen to Movie Addict Headquarters on internet talk radio Add to iTunes

Buy a copy of Confessions of a Movie Addict



Main Page Movies Features Log In/Manage


Rate This Movie
 ExcellentExcellentExcellentExcellentExcellent
 Above AverageAbove AverageAbove AverageAbove Average
 AverageAverageAverage
 Below AverageBelow Average
 Poor
Rated 3 stars
by 1304 people


ReelTalk Movie Reviews
A Cosmic Puzzler
by Betty Jo Tucker

Now let’s get this straight. In the year 2065, humans will be battling phantoms from outer space who have taken over planet Earth. But even though they’re fighting ghosts, the characters in Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within use the type of firepower that usually works with traditional invading forces. And this isn’t a sci-fi comedy? Too bad. The movie might have been saved if played for laughs. Instead, it’s just plain bewildering.

As the first full-length cyberfilm in the history of the world, Final Fantasy ranks as a millstone – er, milestone – movie. Computer generated images provide all its special effects, sets, monsters, and people. But, wouldn’t you know it, those pesky humans just don’t come out right. The leading man (or mannikin) looks like Superman but talks like Alec Baldwin (whose voice seemed more appropriate in Cats and Dogs). One of his sidekicks resembles the boy next door but sounds like an eerie Steve Buscemi from Con Air. Clearly recognizable voices of James Woods (The General’s Daughter), Ving Rhames (Bringing Out the Dead), and Donald Sutherland (Space Cowboys) emerge from characters who appear very different from themselves physically. While this technique works for cartoon characters, my primitive brain rebels against such dissonance where humans are concerned.

Still, even if more commonplace voices had been used, the mechanical appearance of the film’s humans would also be off-putting to me. Case in point: the movie’s feisty heroine, Dr. Aki Ross, whose dialogue is spoken by the relatively unknown Ming-Na of Mulan. Not being distracted by Aki’s verbalizations, I could concentrate on other aspects of her "performance." While her eyes and hair amazed me with their lifelike appearance, she reminded me of a wind-up doll, not a real person. Even the little mole on her face seemed too perfect.

I’m becoming more and more wary of films based on video games. (A big Tomb Raider disappointment remains fresh in my mind.) The inspiration for Final Fantasy came from a highly successful interactive game created by Hironobu Sakaguchi, who also served as the film’s producer and director. "I have always wanted to create a new form of entertainment that fuses the technical wizardry of interactive games with the sensational visual effects of motion pictures," Sakaguchi declares. Although recruiting some of the same artists who worked on The Matrix, Godzilla, Titanic, and The Fifth Element, Sakaguchi failed to put together a movie with the visual thrills of such sci-fi classics as Alien, Blade Runner, and Star Wars. Yes, there are intriguing giant phantoms with filmy, serpentine tongues and tentacles, but they keep showing up over and over again. I don’t think I’m alone in preferring a little variety in my futuristic creatures. Last year’s sci-fi disaster was Battlefield Earth; I’ll be surprised if Final Fantasy doesn’t earn that distinction this year.

What does surprise me, however, is that Oscar-nominee Al Reinert (for Apollo 13) co-wrote (with Jeff Vintar) the nonsensical script for Final Fantasy. In an attempt to blend spiritual themes with environmental concerns and sci-fi adventure, these writers have come up with a plot that defies description. No wonder most of the film’s characters complain "I don’t understand" at one point or another. And that pretty much sums up my feeling about the entire movie. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should do it. Although the technology for a completely digital movie exists, I don’t understand why it was used to make a film as unsatisfying as Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.

(Released by Columbia and Square Pictures; rated "PG-13" for sci-fi action violence.)


                                                                                                                                                                               
 
© 2024 - ReelTalk Movie Reviews
Website designed by Dot Pitch Studios, LLC